Filed: Nov. 10, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 10 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN; No. 09-15703 PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00997-SRB Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ORDER MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity; JOSEPH ARPAIO, Sheriff, and AVA ARPAIO, husband and wife; DENNIS WILENCHIK and BECKY BARTNESS, husband and wife; JOHN DOES I-X; JANE DOES I-X; BLACK CORPORATIONS, I-V; and WHITE PARTNERSHIPS, I-V, Defenda
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 10 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN; No. 09-15703 PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00997-SRB Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ORDER MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity; JOSEPH ARPAIO, Sheriff, and AVA ARPAIO, husband and wife; DENNIS WILENCHIK and BECKY BARTNESS, husband and wife; JOHN DOES I-X; JANE DOES I-X; BLACK CORPORATIONS, I-V; and WHITE PARTNERSHIPS, I-V, Defendan..
More
FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 10 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN; No. 09-15703 PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00997-SRB Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ORDER MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity; JOSEPH ARPAIO, Sheriff, and AVA ARPAIO, husband and wife; DENNIS WILENCHIK and BECKY BARTNESS, husband and wife; JOHN DOES I-X; JANE DOES I-X; BLACK CORPORATIONS, I-V; and WHITE PARTNERSHIPS, I-V, Defendants - Appellees. MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN; No. 09-15806 PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00997-SRB Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff and husband; AVA ARPAIO, wife; JOHN DOES I-X; JANE DOES I-X; BLACK CORPORATIONS, I-V; WHITE Page 2 PARTNERSHIPS, I-V; MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, a public entity, Defendants, and DENNIS WILENCHIK; BECKY BARTNESS, wife, Defendants - Appellants. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Silverman and Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
